Friday, October 5, 2007

Training


Overview • When and why is training necessary? • How should a training program be conducted? • How are training needs determined? • What goes into the design of an effective training program? • What are some of the commonly used training methods? • How can we determine whether training has been effective? Employee Training Why? • Provide knowledge and skills required to perform effectively. When? • New hires (to complement selection) • Change of jobs (e.g., transfer, promotion) • Change to jobs (e.g., new technology; realignment) • Performance deficiencies detected Employee Development Why? • Prepare employees for future positions • Upgrade general skills for personal growth When? • Internal promotion policy • QWL programs • Team building • Developing/changing organizational culture The Training Process Step 1 Conduct training needs analyses Step 3 Review available training methods Step 2 Develop training objectives Step 4 Design/select training methods Step 5 Design training evaluation approach Step 7 measure training results Step 6 Implement training program Needs Analysis Levels of Analysis 1. Organizational Analysis 􀂾 Identification of short- and long-term goals 􀂾 Identification of human resource needs 􀂾 Evaluation of methods of meeting HR needs (e.g., selection, training) 􀂾 Assessment of resource availability 􀂾 Evaluation of support for transfer of training Needs Analysis Levels of Analysis 2. Task (Job) Analysis 􀂾 Identification of: tasks standards optimal procedures Needs Analysis Levels of Analysis 3. Person Analysis 􀂾 Evaluation of individual against standards 􀂾 Identification of deficiencies 􀂾 Identification of causes (e.g., motivation vs. ability) Needs Analysis Levels of Analysis 4. Demographic Analysis 􀂾 Assess the specific training needs of various demographic groups (e.g., the disabled, or those protected by civil rights legislation). Other Common Reasons for Training • Poor performance (without analysis) “They’re not performing, therefore they must need training” • Fad “Everyone else is doing it” • Reward “They deserve it” • Habit “We’ve always done it. Besides, we have a budget for it” Types of Training Programs On-Site Training • On-the-job training • Apprentice training • Coaching/mentoring • Job rotation • On-line help (as needed) Types of Training Programs Off-Site Training • Lectures/seminars • Multi-media presentations • Programmed/Computer-assisted instruction • Simulation • Cases studies/management games • Role-playing • Behaviour modelling Selection and Development of Training Methods Factors to Consider 1. Purpose (based on needs analysis) Common objectives include 􀂾 Information acquisition 􀂾 Skills development (e.g., motor, interpersonal, problem solving, decision-making) Selection and Development of Training Methods 2. Principles of Learning i. Motivation to learn 􀂃 Relevance and meaningfulness 􀂃 Adequate preparation & self-efficacy 􀂃 Choice/participation (e.g., time, content) 􀂃 Clear goals 􀂃 Reinforcement ii. Feedback iii. Opportunity to practice Factors to Consider Selection and Development of Training Methods 3. Transfer of Training Facilitated by: 􀂾 Similarity of setting and task 􀂾 Overlearning 􀂾 Teaching of general principles 􀂾 Reinforcement of transfer Factors to Consider Selection and Development of Training Methods 4. Individual Differences Should accommodate differences in: 􀂾 Readiness to learn 􀂾 Motivation to learn 􀂾 Preferred learning style Factors to Consider Selection and Development of Training Methods 5. Trainer Qualifications Trainers should: 􀂾 Have knowledge of the organization 􀂾 Be knowledgeable about content 􀂾 Be motivated to train 􀂾 Understand principles of learning 6. Cost Factors to Consider Evaluation of Training Criteria (based on Kirkpatrick, 1976) • Reaction 􀂾 Did employees like the training, think it was useful, feel more confident in their abilities? • Learning 􀂾 Did employees learn anything new? • Behavioural 􀂾 Do trainees behave any differently back on the job? • Results 􀂾 Did the training have the desired outcome? Designing an Evaluation Study Issues to Consider 1. Internal Validity 􀂾 accuracy of inference concerning effect of training 2. External Validity 􀂾 accuracy of inference regarding generalizability 3. Construct Validity 􀂾 accuracy of inference about why the training worked Research Designs Pre-experimental Designs • One-group Posttest Only Design T X • One-group Pre-test / Post-test Design X T X Key X = measure T = training R = random assignment Threats to Internal Validity Threats controlled by Random Assignment • History • Maturation • Selection • Testing • Instrumentation • Attrition (Mortality) • Statistical Regression Research Designs Experimental Designs • Pre-test / Post-test Control Group Design R X T X R X X • Pre-test Only Control Group Design R T X R X Key X = measure T = training R = random assignment Research Designs Experimental Designs • Solomon Four-Group Design R X T X R X X R T X R X Key X = measure T = training R = random assignment Threats to Internal Validity Threats not controlled by Random Assignment • Local history • Diffusion or imitation of treatment • Compensatory equalization of treatment • Compensatory rivalry • Resentful demoralization Research Designs Quasi-experimental Designs • Pre-test / Post-test Nonequivalent Groups Design X T X X X • Alternate Treatments Design X T X X X X T X Key X = measure T = training R = random assignment Research Designs Quasi-experimental Designs • Time-series Design X X X X T X X X X Key X = measure T = training R = random assignment Time Outcome 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 x x x x training occurs x x x x Threats to External Validity Examples • Interaction of testing and treatment • Interaction of setting and treatment • Interaction of history and treatment • etc. Threats to Construct Validity Examples: • Placebo effect • Hawthorne effect • Pygmalion effect Evaluation of Training: An Example Purpose: Evaluate the effectiveness of behaviour modelling as a training technique Source: Latham & Saari (1979) Evaluation of Training: An Example Focus of Training: • Orienting new employees • Giving recognition • Motivating poor performers • Correcting poor habits • Discussing potential disciplinary action • Reducing absenteeism • Handling a complaining employee • Reducing turnover • Overcoming resistance to change Evaluation of Training: An Example Length of Training: 2 hrs/wk for 9 weeks Training Procedure: • Initial instructions (learning points) • Videotape of model • Role-playing • Feedback • Monitoring and reinforcement Evaluation of Training: An Example Research Design: • Participants were male first-line supervisors • Randomly divided into two groups 􀂾 Experimental (training) 􀂾 Control (waiting list) Evaluation of Training: An Example Dependent Measures and Results: • Reactions - Survey of attitudes immediately following training & 6 months later - Ratings were found to be uniformly high • Learning - Multiple choice test administered 6 months after training - Exp’t > Control • Behaviour - Role playing 3 months after training - Exp’t > Control • Results - Performance appraisal (standard and BOS) - Pre-training: Exp’t = Control - Post-training: Exp’t > Control

How Do We Curb Sexual Harassment Against Men?

How Do We Curb Sexual Harassment Against Men? [Workforce Management October 04, 2007] Q: I can't find anything on sexual harassment against men. I am the only male in my office and have had to listen to male bashing, slander and other forms of harassment that make me uncomfortable. The boss doesn't want to hear about it but in fact tends to take the women's side. My HR director is also a woman and won't even give me a chance to discuss. Would you give me insight on how to handle this situation? - Anonymous, services, California A: The times, they are a-changin'. It wasn't that long ago that women suffering in the "old boys' network" had limited recourse to pursue claims of harassment and hostile work environment. However, during the transition to today's zero-tolerance environment, it hasn't been easy for men who suffer from the same kind of abuse that women endured for so long. Research indicates that nearly 20 percent of claims of harassment or hostile work environments are made by men, alleging harassment from both men and women. As women take on more powerful roles in organizations, and as gender and sexual preference based discrimination lessens, "male bashing" is more prevalent. But cultural taboos often inhibit men from taking action, fearing they will be negatively labeled and bring even more trouble on themselves. So, what's a man to do? Before taking action, it is important to know that the law is on the side of the harassed. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is indeed filing suits against organizations on behalf of men who allege harassment and have not been able to find relief within their organizations. It's also important to know whether the organization's policies and standards will help. It's often better to resolve the issue internally before resorting to legal action. Many organizations still have slim codes of conduct that don't address harassment or respect. They also may not have detailed policies outlining expected behavior. However, if the organization's code of conduct addresses respect issues broadly, these may influence how a victimized person responds. People who feel victimized also must make pragmatic assessments of the downside risks of raising the issue. Taking action will certainly create new tensions in the workplace. It's hard to say whether the end result will be vindication, or a hard-fought victory that makes it intolerable to continue working for this company (which may in fact be a good thing). You say you are unable to broach this topic with either your boss or HR director. So what's the next step? You can escalate the issue. There are a couple options, each not necessarily mutually exclusive of the other. Nor is one option necessarily better than the other. The first choice might be to go up the chain as far as it takes. If the HR director isn't taking action, go to the CEO. Harassment isn't a matter of whining or complaining. It affects not only the productivity of the harassed individual, but also create a cloud that hovers above the whole organization. Left unresolved, it can bleed over and affect customers and the public. Senior leaders need to be aware of the business risks of failing to take action. State your case in a clam, professional manner. Obviously, this is a very serious issue with the potential for an adverse impact on your company's culture. The issue should be brought to the attention of the highest level of management in the organization. If going up the chain fails to resolve the issue, it may be time to take action that will compel an investigation. If the company is public, it is likely to have an anonymous reporting process, either through a helpline or through contacting the audit committee. In this compliance-oriented environment, raising this issue as an ethics or compliance issue should warrant a serious investigation. If the company is private, the best way to start an internal investigation is to contact the company's legal counsel, whether internal or external. [Source: David Gebler, president, Working Values Ltd., Sharon, Massachusetts, September 20, 2007]